| Home | Help | Search | Login | Register |
|
1
on: August 02, 2010, 03:04:21 pm
|
||
| Started by marcsokol - Last post by marcsokol | ||
|
Is there a recognized method to evaluate the structural capacity of a full penetration weld that has been radiographically tested and found to have defects (such as inclusions and voids)? Are there any technical references that address this issue?
|
||
|
2
on: February 19, 2009, 05:36:50 pm
|
||
| Started by bfelker - Last post by bfelker | ||
|
I am currently trying to design a double angle connection for ductile response to catenary loads induced by support removal. This is for a progressive collapse avoidance design. In order to achieve the assumed catenary structural response assumed in the tie forces design method, the beam end connections for structural steel members utilized as ties must be designed to undergo 0.20-radians of rotation, and still maintain the required capacity. I think I have figured out a way to do this, but would like to see if any research has been done on this type of behavior, and/or if a text has been written which addresses this issue. Any direction would be much appreciated, as I’m not sure where to start looking. Thanks.
|
||
|
3
on: December 21, 2008, 11:55:18 am
|
||
| Started by admin - Last post by john kariotis | ||
|
A draft Commentary to Appendix has been written. This draft Commentary is useful to understand the technical base of Appendix. I will attempt to get the draft of the Appendix posted on http:www.seaoc.org/ebc/ : this site now contains the references associated with the development of Appendix A6
|
||
|
4
on: August 21, 2008, 12:04:53 pm
|
||
| Started by admin - Last post by admin | ||
|
Public Code Change Proposal Form
|
||
